Guy Lubitsh ∙ Professor of Leadership & Psychology at Hult International Business School
Faculty Column ∙ December 18, 2025
“If we are to solve ‘wicked’ problems, we must break the silence in our organizations.”
)
Faculty Column ∙ December 18, 2025
Guy Lubitsh ∙ Professor of Leadership & Psychology at Hult International Business School
)
In a recent leadership meeting, Jean Jereissati, CEO of a leading Brazilian beverage company, made a striking observation: “Business is in constant crisis.” His words were a call to action. He urged his senior leaders to move beyond solving technical, “tame” problems and instead confront the more complex, ambiguous “wicked” problems that define today’s business landscape. His message resonates globally – organizations are navigating seismic shifts, and the leaders who will thrive are those who can foster open communication, dismantle fear, and speak with authority grounded in integrity.
The distinction between “tame” and “wicked” problems, introduced by Professors Horst Rittel and Melvin Webber in 1973, remains profoundly relevant. Tame problems, though potentially complicated, are solvable through established methods – think heart surgery or constructing a bridge.
Wicked problems, on the other hand, are messy, multifaceted, and lack definitive solutions. They include dilemmas like redefining company culture, navigating digital transformation, or responding to global crises. Wicked problems demand more than technical expertise. They require collective intelligence, open dialogue, and the courage and integrity to challenge assumptions. Yet, in many organizations, silence prevails. Why? Because fear still dominates the workplace.
W. Edwards Deming, the American quality pioneer who helped rebuild post-war Japan’s economy, famously declared: “Drive out fear.” It was the eighth of his 14 principles for organizational excellence. He understood that fear stifles innovation, suppresses feedback, and undermines quality. His ninth principle “Break down barriers between departments”, further emphasized the need for open, cross-functional communication. Fear manifests in many forms: fear of failure, fear of looking foolish, fear of challenging authority. In high-pressure environments, this fear can become paralyzing. But it doesn’t have to be this way.
Take Tom Kerridge, one of the UK’s most celebrated chefs. Despite running Michelin-starred restaurants where standards are sky-high, Kerridge fosters a culture where mistakes are not only tolerated but encouraged, as long as they’re in the pursuit of growth. “I’m more disappointed if they don’t try,” he says. “Those people don’t progress.” His approach is a powerful reminder that creativity and performance flourish in environments where people feel safe to speak up.
Harvard Professor Amy Edmondson’s research on psychological safety reveals a critical insight: people don’t just withhold criticism when they feel unsafe. They also withhold ideas. In a psychologically unsafe environment, employees play it safe, avoid speaking up with integrity, and keep their heads down. The result? Stagnation at a time when innovation is essential. L’Oréal, the French cosmetics giant, calls psychological safety the “Cradle of Creativity.” The company recognizes that innovation is a team sport. It thrives when people feel free to share half-formed ideas, challenge each other respectfully, and build on one another’s thinking. Without psychological safety, even the most talented teams will underperform.
Despite the rhetoric around openness, many organizations are still governed by toxic, unwritten rules. These rules aren’t in the employee handbook, but everyone knows them:
Don’t challenge the boss – especially in public.
Don’t speak unless you have irrefutable data.
Don’t question decisions if you were part of making them.
Don’t be negative in meetings – it’s safer to nod along.
These rules are rarely stated aloud, but they’re enforced through subtle cues and cultural norms. And they’re deadly. They create a culture of silence, where people self-censor, avoid conflict, and disengage. Leaders must actively dismantle these rules. That means explicitly inviting dissent, rewarding constructive challenge, and modelling vulnerability and integrity even when the chips are down. It’s not enough to say “my door is always open.” You must prove it again and again.
So how do we move from fear and silence to open communication and collaboration with integrity? Here are four practical shifts every leader can make:
When leaders frame challenges as learning opportunities, they create space for exploration and dialogue. Instead of saying, “Here’s what we need to do,” try saying, “Here’s what we’re trying to figure out – what do you think?” This shift requires humility. It means accepting that discussions may be slower and messier. But it also means unlocking the full potential of your team. In a world of wicked problems, you need every voice in the room.
Leaders don’t need to have all the answers. In fact, pretending to know everything is a fast track to irrelevance. The most respected leaders today are those who can say:
“Have I missed something?”
“What other perspectives should we consider?”
“What can we learn from this?”
These questions signal openness and integrity. They invite contribution. And they model the kind of behavior that builds trust and psychological safety.
Author Stephen Covey’s timeless advice “Seek first to understand, then to be understood” is more relevant than ever. Listening is not a passive act. It’s a leadership skill. It requires curiosity, patience, and the willingness to be changed by what you hear. Too often, leaders overestimate their listening skills. They think they’re being open, but their teams experience them as dismissive or distracted. Closing this gap requires intentionality. Ask more questions. Pause before responding. Reflect back what you’ve heard. These small behaviors can have a big impact.
Speaking with authority doesn’t mean dominating the conversation. It means using your voice to create clarity, set direction, and inspire confidence – while also making space for others to contribute. It’s about being decisive without being dogmatic. Firm, but flexible. Clear, but curious.
In the 21st century, authority is earned through trust, not titles. And trust is built through transparency, consistency and courage.
We are living through an era of profound disruption. The problems we face – climate change, geopolitical instability, workplace loneliness – are wicked in every sense of the word. They cannot be solved by command-and-control leadership. They require collaboration, integrity, open communication and courageous conversations.
As Jean Jereissati reminded his team, business is in constant crisis. But crisis is not just a threat – it’s an opportunity. An opportunity to lead differently. To replace silence with dialogue. Fear with trust. Conformity with courage. The future belongs to leaders who can speak with authority, while also listening with humility.
The question is: are you ready to be that kind of leader?
For more on how to develop psychologically safe environments and make the shift away from silence, see The Leader’s Guide to Collaboration by Dr Guy Lubitsh and Mike Brent.
)
Professor of Leadership & Psychology at Hult International Business School
Over the last twenty-five years, Guy has gained an extensive track record of consulting, coaching, and speaking to thousands of leaders in international organizations across the globe. Regularly featured in top HR magazines, Forbes, and the Financial Times, his work bridges the academic and business worlds, backed by research but rooted in the real world.
Fostering human connection is a theme that runs through all of his work and research. His expertise centers on: creating an inclusive and safe organizational culture; forming effective collaborations in dynamic, digital workplaces; how to view conflict as a source of creativity; how to lead via influencing; and curating and leading high-performing teams, improving joy, and reducing burnout.
)